Should welfare recipients be tested for drugs?

Yes, but I would prefer to end all social welfare programs.

Yes, but only to establish why they need welfare. If they have a criminal record and aren't taking them because they're stressed about providing for their family, arrest them. Otherwise, provide treatment and ensure that welfare doesn't go towards buying booze or drugs.

Also ensure that recipients are honest about themselves and don't lie.

Yes, including all elected and appointed government officials

No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse, plus welfare recipients should provide treatment for those who tested positive for drugs

Welfare should be abolished entirely and replaced by voluntary charity. It is up to each charity whether or not they wish to perform drug tests.

Yes, but give them a three strikes rule. Send them to treatment so they can get off the drugs, but if they keep abusing drugs and they violate the three strikes rule. Terminate their benefits.

Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive for any lethal street drugs. Disregard positive test results for marijuana

No, and legalise and regulate all drugs.

Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive for all lethal street drugs. Disregard positive test results for marijuana

Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive for all lethal street drugs. Disregard positive test results for marijuana.

Yes, but only if they have a secondary criminal history of felonies related to past usage or selling of lethal street drugs. Disregard positive test results for marijuana, and provide treatment for those testing positive for all lethal street drugs

No, only if they have a secondary criminal history of felonies related to past usage or selling of lethal street drugs. Disregard positive test results for marijuana, and provide treatment for those testing positive for all lethal street drugs

Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians, and if they test positive offer them help and treatment.

No, only test those who have built up a criminal history of felonies related to using or transporting lethal street drugs. Provide treatment for those testing positive and disregard any positive results for marijuana usage

No, only those who have built up a secondary criminal history of felonies due to usage or transporting street drugs outside of marijuana.

Yes, but provide treatment for those who test positive for any street drugs outside of marijuana

Yes, but provide treatment for those who test positive for any street drugs outside of marijuana.

No, only if they have a criminal history of felonies that are related to lethal street drug abuse or transporting such drugs

No, abolish welfare and provide free and universal healthcare regardless of drug usage or criminal history.

No, only for those with a secondary criminal history that was related to use of lethal street drugs, and provide treatment for those testing positive. Disregard positive test results for use of marijuana

No, only if they have a secondary criminal history of felonies that are either directly or indirectly related to drug abuse

No, but if recipients come forward about issues with drug addiction, they should be provided treament

Yes, but only if they have a criminal history of felonies related to drug abuse, and provide treatment for those testing positive. Disregard positive test results for marijuana usage

No, only if they have a secondary criminal history of felonies related to drug abuse

Yes, but only if they have a secondary criminal history of felonies related to drug abuse. Provide treatment for such individuals testing positive for lethal street drug usage

No, if they start to show reasoning then maybe but if they have no record or suspicion there isn't a reason to.

No, only if they have a criminal history of felonies that were committed in relation to drug abuse

No, only if they have a criminal history of felons that were committed in relation to drug abuse

No, only if they have a felonious criminal history that is related to drug abuse

No, only if they have a secondary criminal history of felonies that were related to drug abuse

No, only if they have a secondary criminal history of felonies that were somehow related to drug abuse

No, only unless they are accused of using with evidence

No, and all social welfare programs should be abolished.

In my opinion it all depends on the situation

Perhaps they could be if it's necessary, and if they test for drugs that are more extreme and not medical then provide them treatment. If it's simply marijuana or something that has medical use and test levels for it in their system aren't too high then let them be.

Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians; consider terminating benefits for anyone testing positive, and lower welfare gradually

No, drug use should not disqualify someone for receiving welfare

No and we should offer substance abuse supports for people in non punitive ways

No, only if they have a secondary criminal history of felonies that were committed as a result of drug abuse, or related to their usage

Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive for hard drugs.

No, and abolish currency

No, Welfare should be replaced with more specific programs.

Reform the entire welfare system to a negative income tax

No, only if they have a felony criminal history related to abuse of the most fatal street drugs, notably crack cocaine and heroin

Yes, but terminate and provide treatment for anyone testing positive.

Yes. Test some people who get money from the government, and provide treatment if they test positive

Only if there is good reason to believe that person is doing drugs

No, people should be able to live and recurve help from the government without fear. I would support free treatment for anyone with drug problems, though.

no, this could effect dependents such as children that may otherwise starve