Should the military fly drones over foreign countries to gain intelligence and kill suspected terrorists?

Yes, but only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only with permission from the country in question unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but permission from the country in question should be granted first until or unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only for intelligence gathering purposes until there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but their use should be restricted to gathering intelligence until or unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists until or unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

No, only to gather intelligence and to defend civilians.

Yes, and strongly invest in UAS

Yes, but only to gather intelligence, and not to kill suspected terrorists, unless the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war, then 100% NO

Yes, but only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists, unless the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war, then 100% NO

Yes, only to kill.

Yes, but only to gather intelligence and to kill known terrorists, also with the permission of the country in question

Yes but only if they either have permission or are a country known to be harboring terrorists or hostile dicatators.

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists, unless the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war, then 100% NO

No, only to gather intelligence if there is a reasonable suspicion.

yes but kilning of suspected terrorist should be heavily supported and brought to a judge to determine

Yes, only if there is undeniable evidence

Yes, but only to kill.

I think we should be able to if the involved suspected terrorist has viable evidence against them.

Yes, if authorized with reliable intelligence information and sufficient evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist, and granted with full cooperation and permission from the country in question, and if both Congress and the President agree to it.

No, to gather intelligence but, kill terrorists with permission.

yes as long as they catch them doing or planning something to our country

I think only if they are 100 percent sure they terroists planning somthing

Yes, if authorized with reliable intelligence information and sufficient evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist, and with full cooperation and permission from the country in question, if both Congress and the President agree to it.

Yes, if authorized with reliable intelligence information and sufficient evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist then the military should be able to take action upon this to eliminate threats to our country's wellbeing, with full cooperation and permission from the country in question if both Congress and the President agree to it.

Yes, if it is authorized with reliable intelligence information and with factual proof that the potential target is a known terrorist (but they should be captured instead of killing them), and with full cooperation and permission from the country in question, if both Congress and the President agree to it.

This is situational.

Yes, but only if it is used for intelligence purposes, with proper oversight and precautions in place to minimize targeting of civilians, and with full cooperation and permission from the country in question.

Yes however, it depends on the justification of terrorism or political and geopolitical interest.

If it’s essential to seek out information from drones with the suspicion and factual evidence of a U.S Civil threat than I believe it should be deemed necessary to do s. Killing terrorists with drones on the other hand can be deemed necessary only if you see them physically planning an attack or attempting to attack in the process.

Yes, but only if it is used for intelligence purposes. It should be used only if there is enough evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist, then the military should be able act upon this to eliminate threats to our country's wellbeing, with full cooperation and permission from the country in question.

Yes, but their usage should be limited to gathering intelligence unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only if it is used for intelligence purposes, and only if there is enough evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist, then the military should be able act upon this to eliminate threats to our country's wellbeing, with full cooperation and permission from the country in question.

Yes, to gather intelligence and kill confirmed (not merely suspected) terrorists

Yes, to gather intelligence and kill confirmed (not just suspected) terrorists

Yes, they should be used for intelligence purposes, but only if there is enough evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist, then the military should be able act upon this to eliminate threats to our country's wellbeing, with full cooperation and permission from the country in question.

yes, but only if the terrorist has ample evidence they are involved in terrorist activities

Only if proof of an imminent attack becomes undeniable

only if the country the terrorists reside in ask for it

Yes, to gather intelligence when terrorist activities are suspected and to strike suspected enemy targets when the country in question is under a Congressional declaration of war

We should ask for permission from the country in question to gather intelligence on terrorist organizations unless the country in question is supporting terrorist organizations.

Just to kill

Yes, but only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists unless an imminent attack has been confirmed or under a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, they should be used to gather intelligence and kill terrorists, but only if there is enough evidence and the guarantee that more lives will be saved than lost. The military should be able act upon this to eliminate threats to our country's wellbeing.

Yes. However, we should put restrictions into place. The word "suspected" as it is needs to be reviewed. Killing suspected terrorists would not be a good idea - instead, we should capture them and give them a fair trial. And even if they are convicted - the death penalty is also a very controversial punishment.

Only if they have attacked us first.

Yes, but only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists without a Congressional declaration of war present

Last one was a fail, so no.

No, only to gather intelligence. They should not to be used to kill suspected terrorists without a Congressional declaration of war or unless an imminent attack requires an emergency response from the President