A sanctuary city is a city that adopts local policies designed to not prosecute people solely for being an undocumented individual in the country in which they are currently living.
@93RQL4H2yrs2Y
Any city in need of federal funding should receive it.
@WhenDidISayThis2yrs2Y
No, but allow them to receive funding from states
@93F4MVT2yrs2Y
No, local governments should decide whether they want to fund being a sanctuary city
@93BYRXQ2yrs2Y
No, create designated residencies until undocumented immigrants are brought through customs.
@92YHQCV2yrs2Y
Yes, and we should allow for the creation of more sanctuary cities
Deleted2yrs2Y
@9334YP32yrs2Y
No, sanctuary cities should be sanctioned and lose all state and federal representation.
@8DXPPCR2yrs2Y
Yes but not additonal federal funding. If they use their current allocated funding on undocumented individuals that's fine
@92PTBNR2yrs2Y
Yes, but extensive background info should be made to avoid the money from being taken advantage of.
@92P9ZPN2yrs2Y
yes sanctuary cities should receive federal funding to help support the refugees and the city
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, only state funding if voted upon.
@8TKFNNS2yrs2Y
Only for emergency aid other than No
@92DQP2K2yrs2Y
Yes, but add incentives for local governments to speed up the documentation process.
@9299B9H2yrs2Y
Yes, but mainly for rolls who need dire sanctuary
@925J4Q82yrs2Y
depends on how much they are used
@926DQTR2yrs2Y
Yes, but a small amount.
@8Z87KK52yrs2Y
Yes, the executive branch should not be allowed to pick and choose who to fund
@ThomasJJ992yrs2Y
No, only state funding.
@8TKFNNS2yrs2Y
Yes Only when there is emergency event after that it should a temporary option decided by The Governor of each state.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, only state funding if approved.
@8YVT3552yrs2Y
It just depends on what the funding would be targeted for
@8YQ34652yrs2Y
No, Sanctuary cities for illegal immigrants should be illegal
@6Q2LC7Q2yrs2Y
Yes, for services not related to immigration enforcement.
@8Y9795B2yrs2Y
No, the government should not be involved as long as they do not pose as a threat.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it is not the federal government's job to fund sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let states/local governments decide.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it is not the federal government's job to fund sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let states/local governments decide if they want to do so, or not, to fund sanctuary cities within their state.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it is not the federal government's job to fund sanctuary cities. However, the federal government cannot ban sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let states/local governments decide if they want to do so, or not, to fund sanctuary cities within their state.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it is not the federal government's job to fund sanctuary cities. Let states/local governments decide if they want to do so or fund sanctuary cities within their state.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it is not the federal government's job to fund sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let states/local governments decide if they want to do so, or fund sanctuary cities within their state.
@8XLR4JX2yrs2Y
Reform the immigration system. Then sanctuary cities wouldn’t be needed in the first place
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it is not the federal government's job to fund sanctuary cities but they shouldn't ban them since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let state's/local governments decide if they want to do so, or fund sanctuary cities within their state.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it is not the federal government's job to fund sanctuary cities but they shouldn't ban them since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let state's/local governments decide if they want to make their city a "Sanctuary City" or fund sanctuary cities within their state.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it is not the federal government's job to fund sanctuary cities but they shouldn't ban sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let state's/local governments decide if they want to make their city a "Sanctuary City" or fund sanctuary cities within their state.
@8XHNZZH2yrs2Y
I dont understand what this question means
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it is not the federal government's job to fund sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let states/local governments decide if they want to do so or fund sanctuary cities within their state.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it's not the federal government's job to fund sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let states/local governments decide if they want to do so or fund sanctuary cities within their state.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, it's not the federal government's job to fund sanctuary cities but don't ban it since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let states/local governments decide if they want to do so or fund sanctuary cities within their state.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, the federal government should not fund sanctuary cities. However, the federal government cannot ban sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let states/local governments decide if they want to make their city a "Sanctuary City" or fund sanctuary cities within their state.
@8X4798W2yrs2Y
No, but they should not be punished for nullifying federal law
Deleted3yrs3Y
State funding not federal
@8WG92P33yrs3Y
No, funding should instead be used towards helping people become legitimate citizens
Deleted3yrs3Y
No, the federal government should not fund sanctuary cities. However, the federal government cannot ban sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let each states/local governments decide or fund sanctuary cities within their state.
@8VMYBSV3yrs3Y
No, but allow state's to fund at a local level and do not ban them.
@887SFZP3yrs3Y
Yes, and sanctuary cities should be a federal model
@8VGRKHN3yrs3Y
we would have to look into all the pros and cons
@8VC7WDN3yrs3Y
No, ban the use of sanctuary cities and federally charge those who refuse to comply
@8VC7WDN3yrs3Y
No, bn the use of sanctuary cities and federally charge those who refuse to comply
Deleted3yrs3Y
Not federal funding but states should be allowed to vote on the issue.
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, so they are able to function with necessities like any other city, and reform immigration policies to expedite the process for legal citizenship status
