Should the U.S. continue to participate in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)?

No, the agreement has resulted in the exportation of thousands of manufacturing jobs in exchange for low-wage labor

No, the agreement has resulted in the exportation of thousands of American manufacturing jobs to other countries in exchange for low wage labor

No, this should be renegotiated and replaced with an agreement that balances trade more fairly and restricts the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs

Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated to ensure a greater balance of trade and restrictions on the exportation of manufacturing jobs

Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated to help ensure a fair trade balance, living wages for manufacturing labor, and restricting outsourcing of domestic jobs

Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated to help ensure a fair trade balance, living wages and reasonable amounts of working hours for manufacturing labor, and to restrict outsourcing of domestic jobs

Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated to help ensure living wages and reasonable amounts of working hours for manufacturing labor, and to restrict outsourcing of domestic jobs

Yes, but I am fine with the USMCA policy.

Yes, but we should add more provisions that promote better protections for workers (i.e. better/adequate wages and working conditions), consumers, and the environment; and to ensure it is used only to benefit/serve the consumers instead of corporate interests.

Yes, but we should add more provisions that promote better protections for workers (i.e. better/adequate wages and working conditions), consumers, and the environment; and to ensure it is used only to benefit consumers instead of corporations. It should be enacted on each trade agreements.

No, NAFTA has cost us nearly 700,000 American jobs. After all, free trade agreements like NAFTA, Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China, and the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement have allowed too many American jobs to move overseas. Plus, Previous trade deals and the loss of manufacturing jobs have had disastrous consequences for American workers.

No, a substitute trade agreement for NAFTA needs to be drafted and negotiated between the member countries to address the issues of trade balance, restricting the outsourcing of jobs, and a livable wage scale for workers

No, NAFTA or a new trade agreement needs to be renegotiated between the member countries to address the issues of trade balance, restricting the outsourcing of jobs, and a fair, livable wage scale for workers

No, NAFTA was ripping off the United States millions of manufacturing jobs were lost because of it instead, I support the making of USMCA.

No, either NAFTA or a new trade agreement needs to be renegotiated between the member countries to address the issues of trade balance, limiting the exportation of jobs, and a fair livable wage scale for workers

Yes, but we should add more provisions that promote better protections for workers (i.e. better, more adequate wages and working conditions), consumers, and the environment; and to ensure it is used only to benefit consumers instead of corporations. It should be enacted on each trade agreements.

Yes, Promote free trade have some amount of jobs here.

Yes, but we should add more provisions that better protect labor (i.e. more wages and better working conditions), consumer and environmental protections, and to ensure it is used only to benefit consumers instead of corporations. It should be applied on every trade agreements.

No, a new trade agreement to replace NAFTA should be negotiated between the member countries, one that gives more consideration to balance of trade, saving jobs and livable wages for workers

Yes, but we should add more provisions that better protect labor rights (for adequate wages and better working conditions), consumer and environmental protections, and to ensure it is used only to benefit consumers instead of corporations. It should be applied on every trade agreements.

Yes, but we should add more provisions that better protect labor rights (for better/adequate wages and working conditions), consumer and environmental protections, and to ensure it is used only to benefit consumers instead of corporations. It should be applied on every trade agreements.

Yes, but we should also add provisions that better protect labor (for better/adequate wages and working conditions), consumer and environmental protections, and used only to benefit consumers instead of multinational corporations. It should be applied on every free trade agreements.

Yes, but we should also add provisions that better protect labor (i.e. better/adequate wages and working conditions), consumer and environmental protections, and used only to benefit consumers instead of multinational corporations. It should be applied on every free trade agreements.

Yes, but it needs to be renegotiated/reformed to address the trade imbalance and jobs moving out of country. It should include: 1) worker's rights (i.e. better/adequate wages and working conditions); and 2) consumer and environmental protections.

Yes, but it needs to be renegotiated/reformed to address the trade imbalance and jobs moving out of country. It should include: 1) worker's rights (i.e. better or adequate wages and working conditions); and 2) consumer and environmental protections.

Yes, but only if the agreement can be renegotiated among the member countries to address the issues of trade balance, limiting the exportation of jobs, and fair livable wages for labor

No, a new trade agreement should be negotiated among the member countries to address the issues of trade balance, limiting the exportation of jobs, and fair livable wages for labor

No, but I do support free trade

Yes, but only if the agreement is renegotiated to address the issues of trade balance among the member countries, limiting the exportation of jobs, and fair livable wages for labor

No, a new trade agreement should be negotiated that places more emphasis on fair trade, limiting the outsourcing of jobs, and mandating living wages for workers.

No, a new trade agreement should be negotiated that places far more emphasis on fair trade, limiting the outsourcing of jobs, and living wages for employees

Yes, but it needs to be renegotiated/reformed to address the trade imbalance and jobs moving out of country. It should include: 1) worker's rights (e.g. better working conditions and fair wages); 2) consumer and environmental protections; and 3) adequate trade of goods.

Yes, but it needs to be renegotiated/reformed to address the trade imbalance and jobs moving out of country. It should include: 1) worker's rights (e.g. better working conditions and fair wages and benefits); 2) consumer/environmental protections; and 2) better or adequate trade of goods.

Yes, but only with more environmental and workers protections.

No, job outsourcing has grown too large and trade between the member countries has become too imbalanced

NAFTA should be reworked, but the underlying principle is important.

Yes, but only if the agreement is re-negotiated between the member countries to address the issues of balancing trade, limiting job outsourcing and a livable wage scale for labor

Yes, but only if the agreement is re-negotiated between the member countries to address the issues of balance of trade, limiting job outsourcing and a livable wage scale for labor

Yes, but only if the agreement is renegotiated between the participating countries to address the issues of trade imbalance, job outsourcing and living wages for labor

Yes, but the agreement needs to be re-negotiated among the member countries to address the issues of job outsourcing and the guarantee of livable wages as part of workers' rights

Yes, but the agreement needs to be re-negotiated among the member countries to address the issues of job outsourcing and a guarantee of livable wages as part of workers' rights

Yes, but the agreement needs to be re-negotiated among the member countries to address the issues of limiting job outsourcing and guaranteeing livable wages as part of workers' rights

Yes, but the agreement needs to be re-negotiated among the member countries to address the issues of limiting job outsourcing and livable wages as part of workers' rights

NAFTA should be replaced by the USMCA

No, a new trade agreement needs to be drafted and negotiated among the member countries to address the issues of imbalance of trade, outsourcing of jobs, and the guarantee of a livable wage as part of workers' rights

Yes, but issues related to the agreement should be negotiated among the member countries and either included or amended in a new draft, such as the outsourcing of jobs and livable wages as part of workers' rights

Yes, but aspects of the agreement should be renegotiated among the member countries, such as the issues of outsourcing of jobs and livable wages as part of workers' rights

Yes, but aspects of the agreement should be renegotiated among the member countries, such as the issues of outsourcing of jobs and livable wages as part of workers rights

Yes, but re-negotiate aspects of the agreement to address the issues of outsourcing of jobs among the member countries and livable wages as part of workers rights