Net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should treat all data on the internet equally.
@93S5CYR7mos
No, and nationalize ISPs.
@92YHQCV9mos
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, plus we should treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
@88NZKDZ1yr
No, and we shouldn't have private internet service providers. This industry should be syndicated and available for free for everyone.
@8Y2PBJR1yr
NO, DO PEOPLE DO THIS? that is so freaking stupid. THAT'S WHY M MOBILE DATA SUCKS!!!
Deleted1yr
indifferent on this issue
@8W949N61yr
The internet should be open and free, but private companies have the right to speed up access to websites that pay more for advertising.
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. ISPs need to treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet.
@8LJSX8D2yrs
Their choice also it's the people's choice to business with them
@8SXSTLG2yrs
I don't really care for this so can't have an opinion on it.
@IINXMP2yrs
No, and the internet should be decentralized.
@8RPPVM62yrs
I don't a stance on this issue.
@IINXMP2yrs
Yes, but we should support the openess and freedom of the internet, as well as support companies like Stacks, who give the user power over their own data.
@8P6PWZP2yrs
No, the government should not be involved in internet traffic.
@89GKS952yrs
Yes, but only if the infrastructure is opened up for all companies to use.
@eleemoore2yrs
The government shouldn’t be involved.
@6PJZCMJ2yrs
Yes, but ISPs that do this should be boycotted.
@8J7VYJT2yrs
No, quality of service should be determined by the internet plan of the destination address, not the source.
@Finickydesert2yrs
No, the internet should be free for all
Deleted2yrs
If the ISP charges fixed rates for fixed levels of service, that would be acceptable. If the ISP actually degrades the service of one user to increase that of another, that is unacceptable.
@ISIDEWITH9yrs
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
@ISIDEWITH9yrs
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
@ISIDEWITH9yrs
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
@ISIDEWITH9yrs
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
@ISIDEWITH9yrs
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
