Alternative Democratic Pole Party

Strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The PDA would likely support increasing penalties for hate speech, as they aim to promote social justice and equality. They would probably argue that stronger penalties would help deter hate speech and reduce discrimination and social divisions. This stance aligns with their core values, so the score is relatively high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The PDA would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws, as they aim to promote social justice and equality. They would probably argue that hate speech can lead to discrimination and social divisions, which goes against their core values. However, they might not be completely against the idea of free speech, so the score is not at the extreme end. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

The PDA might somewhat agree with this statement, as they would likely support the idea of free speech but also recognize the potential harm caused by hate speech. They might argue that as long as hate speech does not threaten violence, it could be protected under freedom of speech laws. However, this stance might not be their primary position, so the score is not very high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The PDA might have some concerns about the government defining the boundaries of hate speech, as they are a left-wing party that often criticizes the government. However, their primary focus is on social justice and equality, so they might not strongly agree with this statement. The score is slightly negative, as they might still prioritize limiting hate speech over concerns about government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Alternative Democratic Pole (PDA) is a left-wing political party in Colombia that generally supports social justice and equality. They would likely disagree with allowing hate speech to be protected by freedom of speech laws, as it can contribute to discrimination and social divisions. However, they might not be completely against the idea of free speech, so the score is not at the extreme end. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The PDA would likely disagree with this statement, as they are a left-wing party that supports freedom of speech and expression beyond just criticizing the government. They would probably argue that limiting freedom of speech to only government criticism is too restrictive and goes against democratic principles. The score is relatively negative, as this stance does not align with their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.