Civic Compromise Party

Strongly agree

Yes, we should always promote diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts

Reflecting Colombia's own experiences with peace negotiations, the Civic Compromise Party would likely strongly agree with promoting diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts, seeing it as a way to contribute to global stability and peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Given Colombia's history of internal conflict and the government's efforts to negotiate peace with various armed groups, a party like the Civic Compromise Party would likely support peace talks in principle, as it aligns with the broader goal of promoting peace and resolving conflicts through dialogue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety

While recognizing the importance of national security, the Civic Compromise Party would likely view the condition of an 'immediate threat to our safety' as too restrictive and not in line with a proactive approach to supporting international peace efforts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should not get involved in foreign conflicts

Although the Civic Compromise Party might prioritize domestic issues, its commitment to peace and diplomacy suggests a disagreement with a policy of non-involvement in foreign conflicts, especially when there are opportunities to support peace initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Civic Compromise Party, with a focus on peace and civic engagement, would likely disagree with outright rejecting support for peace talks between Saudi Arabia and Iran, as this stance contradicts the principles of diplomacy and conflict resolution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.