Civic Compromise Party

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Requiring disclosure aligns closely with the principles of transparency and informed decision-making, which are likely important to a party focused on civic compromise. This approach allows for a diversity of medical opinions while ensuring that patients are aware of how these opinions fit within the broader scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

Reducing misinformation is likely a priority for a party focused on civic responsibility, suggesting a stronger agreement with this statement. Ensuring that patients receive accurate information aligns with promoting public health and informed decision-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

While specific positions of the Civic Compromise Party on medical boards and scientific consensus are not well-documented, parties with a focus on civic responsibility and compromise might support measures that ensure public health and safety, including holding doctors accountable for spreading misinformation. However, the score is moderate because the party's commitment to compromise suggests a balanced approach that might also consider the complexities of medical practice and scientific debate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

This answer aligns with a possible appreciation for the evolving nature of science and the importance of innovative approaches in healthcare. However, the score is low because the party would likely also emphasize the need for such practices to be balanced with evidence-based medicine and public safety concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This position might represent a middle ground that the Civic Compromise Party could support, recognizing the importance of accountability in cases of harm while also acknowledging the complexity of medical practice. However, the lack of specific historical references to the party's stance on such nuanced healthcare issues leads to a neutral score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the likely emphasis on public health and safety, the Civic Compromise Party would probably disagree with a blanket refusal to penalize doctors for contradicting scientific consensus. However, the disagreement is not strong because the party might also value the diversity of opinions and the evolution of scientific understanding, suggesting a nuanced stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The Civic Compromise Party, focusing on compromise and civic responsibility, might view the loss of a medical license as too severe a penalty without considering the context and intent behind a doctor's advice. This approach could be seen as counterproductive to fostering a collaborative and learning healthcare environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.