Historical Pact Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The Colombian Historical Pact is a coalition of left-wing and progressive parties, which generally support transparency and accountability. They would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers, as it aligns with their goals of fighting corruption and promoting social justice. However, there might be some nuances in their stance, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

The Historical Pact would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers if the information was legally obtained, as it aligns with their goals of promoting transparency and fighting corruption. However, they might also support protecting whistleblowers who obtained information illegally if it exposes significant corruption or injustice, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

The Historical Pact might agree with protecting whistleblowers if releasing the information does not threaten national security, as it balances the need for transparency with the need to protect the country. However, this stance might not be as strong as fully protecting whistleblowers, which is more in line with their goals of fighting corruption and promoting social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reduce their sentences

The Historical Pact might partially agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, as it could be seen as a compromise between protecting them and ensuring that they face consequences for any illegal actions. However, this stance is not as strong as fully protecting whistleblowers, which is more in line with their goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, the Historical Pact is generally in favor of transparency and accountability, so they would likely disagree with not protecting whistleblowers. However, there might be some nuances in their stance, which is why the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.