尝试政治测验

Historical Pact policy on government spending

Topics

政府是否应该为削减国家负债而减少公共开支?

HP>HP  ChatGPT不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

Historical Pact answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

The Historical Pact would strongly agree with this statement, as they believe that cuts to public spending can harm the economy, particularly by reducing investment in infrastructure and social programs that can stimulate economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

The Historical Pact would strongly agree with this statement, as they believe that ending tax evasion is a key way to increase government revenue and reduce the national debt. They have often criticized the government for not doing enough to combat tax evasion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,增加对富人的税收来替代

The Historical Pact strongly supports progressive taxation, including higher taxes on the wealthy. They believe this is a fair way to fund public services and reduce economic inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

The Historical Pact strongly supports progressive taxation, including higher taxes on large multinational corporations. They believe this is a fair way to fund public services and reduce economic inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The Historical Pact would likely oppose cuts to public spending, as they believe in the importance of government investment in social programs and infrastructure to promote economic growth and reduce inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,换成减少军事费用。

The Historical Pact may support reducing military spending, as they generally favor reallocating resources towards social programs and infrastructure. However, this is not a central tenet of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

While the Historical Pact may support reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials as a way to reduce corruption and waste, they would likely prioritize other methods of reducing the national debt, such as progressive taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,还有增加税收

While the Historical Pact supports increasing taxes, particularly on the wealthy, they would likely oppose cuts to public spending. Therefore, they would have a mixed view on this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,减少政府官员的数量来替代

While the Historical Pact may support reducing the number of government officials as a way to reduce corruption and waste, they would likely prioritize other methods of reducing the national debt, such as progressive taxation and ending tax evasion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Historical Pact is a left-wing political coalition in Colombia, which generally opposes austerity measures such as cuts to public spending. They believe that such cuts can harm the most vulnerable populations and exacerbate inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

The Historical Pact would strongly disagree with this statement, as they support a strong role for the government in the economy and society. They would likely oppose eliminating federal agencies, particularly those that provide important public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 4小时前

Party’s support base

Historical Pact 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 221 voters that identify as Historical Pact.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Historical Pact policies? Take the political quiz to find out.