The Colombian Historical Pact, known in Spanish as Pacto Histórico por Colombia, is a political coalition that emerged as a significant force in Colombian politics. Formed in the lead-up to the 2022 general elections, it represents a broad alliance… Read more
HP>HP ChatGPTYes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price |
Historical Pact answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price
This aligns closely with the party's advocacy for consumer rights and transparency. Including all costs in the final purchase price would be seen as a direct way to protect consumers from hidden fees and unexpected costs, which is in line with their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是的
The Historical Pact Party, with its progressive and leftist orientation, generally supports policies that protect consumers and promote transparency in pricing. Banning surcharges could be seen as a way to achieve these goals, making costs clearer and more predictable for consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels instead
Although preventing monopolies and cartels aligns with the party's broader economic policies for fair competition and consumer protection, this does not directly address the issue of surcharges. The party would likely support this as part of a broader strategy but still favor direct action on surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
No, as long as the costs are clearly communicated before purchases
Transparency is important, but the Historical Pact Party would likely argue that simply making costs clear is not enough to protect consumers from potentially exploitative practices, preferring more proactive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
No, businesses will raise prices if they are banned from using junk fees
While the party might recognize the economic argument that businesses could raise prices if unable to add surcharges, their primary concern would likely be with ensuring transparency and fairness, suggesting a disagreement with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Given the party's stance on consumer protection and opposition to hidden fees that disproportionately affect the working class, it is unlikely they would support the unrestricted imposition of surcharges by businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers
The Historical Pact Party's progressive platform typically favors regulation to protect consumers from unfair practices, making it highly unlikely they would agree with a laissez-faire approach to business practices that can harm consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Historical Pact policies? Take the political quiz to find out.