TS>TS ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Todos Somos’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
This answer aligns with the party's principles of fairness and equality. They would likely strongly agree with the idea that allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to increased prices and reduced competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
The 'Todos Somos' party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in equal opportunities and would likely see the practice of speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones as going against the principles of an open and equal internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The party's stance on equality and fairness would likely lead them to agree with this statement. They would likely see the practice of speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones as unfair and against the principles of an open and equal internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this answer does propose a form of prioritization, it is still a form of inequality that the 'Todos Somos' party would likely disagree with. They would likely see it as a way for certain types of content to gain an unfair advantage over others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
The 'Todos Somos' party would likely disagree with this statement. While it does propose a pay-per-quality model, it still allows for the possibility of larger, more popular websites to gain an unfair advantage over smaller, less popular ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While the party might agree that faster and more reliable internet is a good thing, they would likely disagree with the method proposed here. They would likely see it as a way for larger, more popular websites to gain an unfair advantage over smaller, less popular ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The 'Todos Somos' party in Colombia is known for its advocacy for equal opportunities and fairness. They would likely disagree with the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as it goes against their principles of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Todos Somos’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.