Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
J>J Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
经济 › 税
J>J Personal answerTax according to income. Rich should pay slightly more and adjust for those in lower income brackets. |
社会 › LGBT收养权
J>J Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks, but individual adoption agencies (especially religious adoption agencies) should not be forced to violate their beliefs. I also believe a masculine and feminine balance is the best environment for child development, though this does not necessarily have to come from a man and a woman. |
环境 › Animal Testing
J>J Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
J>J Personal answer增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
J>J Personal answer不,社交媒体公司是私有公司,不应受政府监管 |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if they recieve proper training and meet specific certification, and is voluntary |
医保 › 安全港
J>J Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
医保 › 精神健康
J>J Personal answerA combination of public and private research would likely be best. |
社会 › 安乐死
J>J Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
J>J Personal answerYes, the should be required to take classes to better their chances of becoming law abiding citizens. Classes such as stress and anger management, education skills which will enable them to find productive work |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
J>J Personal answerCombine Medicaid, Medicare, and S-CHIP into one bureaucracy. Public Option for all adults through Medicaid/Medicare for catastrophic coverage, children covered automatically, adults participate in Health Savings Account co-pay for non-emergency treatments with citizen paying 30%-100% of costs depending on citizen's income. All elective procedures will be paid for by consumer. This will bring actual consumer price controls and transparency to distorted health care market. Medicare will negotiate prices for pharmaceuticals and medical devices which is done in other smaller countries very successfully, the difference being Medicare will be negotiating with the leverage of 330 million people as opposed to smaller democracies whose populations are fractions of the United States'. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
J>J Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
J>J Personal answerNo, but there should be regulations and there should be a ban on accounts/posts not explicitly tagged as Political, Bias, or Advertising. It should be clear to every user that it is an opinion/advertisement. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
J>J Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
J>J Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
外交政策 › 外国援助
J>J Personal answer减少对外援助支出,直到显著减少我国的预算赤字 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
J>J Personal answerYes, within a similar group (i.e. transgender group). |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
J>J Personal answerNAFTA is unfair to the United States, but we need to increase efforts to renegotiate NAFTA, because free trade is beneficial to the economy as long as it is fair for the US. |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
J>J Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
医保 › World Health Organization
J>J Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
移民 › 技术移民
J>J Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
移民 › 双重国籍
J>J Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
J>J Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
移民 › 移民同化
J>J Personal answerNo, they should have a choice but it should be heavily recommended, seeing as it is our countries main language. |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
J>J Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.